Reading a COA
Last reviewed 23 July 2026
A certificate of analysis (COA) is a laboratory's record of what a specific batch of material was tested for, how, and with what result. Reading one well means checking that it is tied to the batch in front of you, that it names the methods and the laboratory, and that its numbers can be independently confirmed — not simply that a purity figure looks high.
This page explains how to read any peptide certificate critically, including ours. It is written so the same checks apply to any supplier's document: a certificate only demonstrates quality if you can verify it, and verification is a skill worth having.
A certificate of analysisCertificate of analysis (COA)A document reporting the analytical test results for a specific batch of material, issued by the laboratory that tested it.Full definition → is a report of measurements. For one identified batch it states what was tested, the method used, and the result obtained, signed off by the laboratory that did the work. It is evidence of testing, not a guarantee of fitness for any purpose.
It is not a marketing document, a label, or a substitute for traceability. A glossy page quoting "99% purity" with no method, no batch number and no laboratory named is a claim, not a certificate. The difference between the two is the whole subject of this page.
Two questions a good certificate lets you answer are distinct and both matter: what is this material (identity), and how pure is it (composition). A third — how much peptide is present — is a separate measurement again, covered in purity versus net peptide content.
A complete certificate makes each of the following explicit. If a field is missing, that absence is itself information.
| Field | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Compound identity | States which molecule was tested, ideally with the sequence or a structural reference. |
| Batch / lot numberBatch (lot) numberA unique identifier assigned to a single production run, linking the physical vial to its own certificate of analysis.Full definition → | Ties the certificate to one production run and to the vial in your hand. |
| Manufacture date | Anchors stability and shelf-life reasoning. |
| Test date | Shows when the result was actually obtained, not just when the batch was made. |
| Method(s) used | A result without a stated method (for example a purity figure with no mention of HPLC) is incomplete. |
| Result(s) | The measured values, with units and against any stated specification. |
| Testing laboratory | The name of the lab that performed the work, ideally independent and contactable. |
| Analyst / signature | A named analyst or authorised signature indicates accountability for the result. |
A single headline percentage answers one question at most. A trustworthy certificate reports several measurements — identity, purity, and often water content and net peptide content — each with its own method.
Most peptide purity figures come from reverse-phase HPLCReverse-phase HPLCThe most common HPLC mode for peptides, separating molecules by how strongly they interact with a non-polar column.Full definition →. The instrument separates the components of a sample so that each elutes from the column at a characteristic retention timeRetention timeThe time a component takes to travel through a chromatography column and reach the detector, characteristic under fixed conditions.Full definition →, producing a chromatogramChromatogramThe plot produced by a chromatography run, showing detector signal over time as separated components pass through.Full definition →: detector response plotted against time.
Reading a trace comes down to a few habits:
Chromatographic purityPurity (chromatographic)The percentage of the main peak's area relative to the total peak area on a chromatogram — a measure of composition, not quantity.Full definition → is then the area of the main peak divided by the total area of all peaks, expressed as a percentage. Because that figure depends on how the sample was detected, a purity number should always be reported with its method — the principle behind analytical method validation set out in ICH Q2(R2).
Mass spectrometryMass spectrometryAn analytical technique that measures the mass-to-charge ratio of ionised molecules to confirm a compound's identity by its molecular weight.Full definition → answers a different question: identity. The instrument measures the molecular weightMolecular weightThe mass of one molecule of a compound, expressed in daltons (Da) — the value mass spectrometry checks against the expected figure.Full definition → of the ionised molecule, and a certificate reports the expected mass (calculated from the sequence) alongside the observed mass.
Mass spectrometry answers what is it. HPLC answers how pure is it. Amino acid analysis answers how much peptide is there. A certificate that speaks to only one of the three is only partly informative.
Any one of these should prompt more questions before the certificate is treated as evidence:
Verification is what turns a certificate from a claim into evidence:
Here is one of our own published third-party results, read field by field. The purity figure and laboratory are real and independently verifiable; the batch number and dates live on the laboratory's own certificate, linked below.
Worked example — a real published result
Reading an independent Retatrutide certificate, field by field.
This is guidance on interpreting analytical documents. It is reference information about laboratory testing and quality assurance only, and makes no claim about any use of any material.
Peptide laboratory testing methods
Which tests prove what about a peptide, and what does each one miss?
How to verify a peptide supplier
How do you objectively evaluate a research-peptide supplier?
Purity versus net peptide content
Why isn't the milligram figure on a vial the amount of peptide you are getting?